Facebook

If, like 200 mil­lion other people on the planet, you’ve got a Face­book account then you’ll no doubt be aware that the social net­work­ing site rolled-out its per­son­al­ized account User­names last Sat­urday morning.

This move was announced on their blog earlier this month and seems to have gen­er­ated quite a bit of controversy.

If you don’t have a clue what I’m talk­ing about, then here’s a quick summary:

Face­book Van­ity URLs

If you have a Face­book account then you’ll have a URL (web address) that points to your pub­lic Face­book pro­file on the web.

For me this has his­tor­ic­ally been: www.facebook.com/people/ Jai­mie - Dob­son /696284742

This makes for a very long web address to recall, so if you want to share your Face­book pro­file address with oth­ers, then there’s a lot of char­ac­ters and digits to remember.

So inline with Twit­ter and MySpace, Face­book has decided to give it’s Users the abil­ity to register a shorter and more share­able User­names for their accounts. These User­names are being based on the name used in your Face­book account and may be set-up from the Face­book page at www.facebook.com/username The shorter URLs are often referred to as “Van­ity URL“s because they are based upon the account holder’s own name.

I’ve already cre­ated mine, which is now set at: http://www.facebook.com/Jaimie.Dobson I’m sure you’ll agree that this is a lot easier to remem­ber than the exten­ded web address above.

Face­book Fan Pages

How­ever, what if you’re a busi­ness, a band or club that has it’s own Fan Page? His­tor­ic­ally these have had a con­vo­luted URL such as http://www.facebook.com/pages/Joe-Bonamassa/8403829658

Again, not the easi­est URL to share with your cli­ents and fans. How­ever, with this launch of per­son­al­ized User­names, Face­book has given Fan Page own­ers the option to register a shortened ver­sion of their Page URL as well the per­sonal van­ity URLs I talk about above. BUT the page has to have over 1000 fans to qual­ify. If your Page falls into this camp, you’ll have to wait until the end of the month to register a cus­tom URL.

I sus­pect most small organ­isa­tions that have a Fan Page will have less than 1000 fans and as such will res­ult in a little frus­tra­tion but I can see the think­ing behind it.

If you are a Face­book Page owner with less than 1000 fans and want to pro­tect your registered trade­mark, visit this page to log it with Facebook.

Will They Be Popular?

The launch of these van­ity URLs for both per­sonal account names and Fan Pages was anti­cip­ated to be a bit of a land-grab in the same way that Twit­ter User­names and Domains Names have become.

Ini­tial reports on Sat­urday indic­ated this to be the case with over 200,000 User­names being registered in the first 3 minutes.

Should You Grab Yours?

Admit­tedly, this Face­book user­name malar­key isn’t some­thing I’m get­ting that excited about.

How­ever if you’re pro­tect­ive about your online iden­tity and brand­ing then I would say go for it! Get your name whilst you can, and if you cur­rently run a Fan Page with less than 1000 fans, don’t hang around too long after the 28th of June to grab yours in the second land-grab rush of the month.

Other Posts Sim­ilar To This One

Tagged with:
 

2 Responses to “Per­son­al­ized Face­Book URLs — Who Really Cares?”

  1. Amelia Vargo says:

    This is great for people who want to pre­serve their online iden­tity, and for many people who use sites such as Twit­ter they can have the same user­name, which is obvi­ously easier for people to remem­ber and helps pre­serve their iden­tity. How­ever, if you’re slow off the mark, how bad would you feel if someone else used your user­name? They could say any­thing, and other people may think they were you.

  2. Hi Jai­mie

    Thanks for this. I got mine after read­ing this and will try and get the ‘Fan Page’ ones when they come out.

    Social Net­work­ing seems to now be the norm for busi­ness net­work­ing also and to be able to quote your Twit­ter and FB page simply (mine are both the same /dannymatharu) makes sense.

    Why didn’t FB do this in the first instance? Was it simply because they didn’t think it would be as big as it is and thus turn into such a big ‘busi­ness’ tool?

Leave a Reply





News­let­ter Sign-Up

Sign up to our reg­u­lar e-shots for updates on new offers, work­shops and services.


Unsub­scribe |